Page 46 - New Cloth Market December 2022 Digital Edition

Industrial Hemp Fibers: An Overview

Sapuan, S.M.; Asim, M.; Saba, N. Nat- Composites. Compos. Part B Eng. ites: Porosity, Water Absorption, Me-
ural Fiber Reinforced Polylactic Acid 2012, 43, 856–860. [CrossRef] chanical Performances and Vis-
Composites: A Review. Polym. Com- 70. Hajiha, H.; Sain, M. High Toughness coelastic Behaviour. Compos. Part A
pos. 2019, 40, 446–463. [CrossRef] Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 61, 1–12.
Hybrid Biocomposite Process Opti-
[CrossRef]
60. Mashouf Roudsari, G.; Mohanty, A.K.; mization. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015,
Misra, M. Green Approaches to Engi- 111, 44–49. [CrossRef] 79. Mwaikambo, L.Y.; Ansell, M.P. Chem-
neer Tough Biobased Epoxies: A 71. Samanta, S.; Muralidhar, M.; Singh, ical Modification of Hemp, Sisal, Jute,
Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. T.J.; Sarkar, S. Characterization of and Kapok Fibers by Alkalization. J.
2017, 5, 9528–9541. [CrossRef] Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 84, 2222–
Mechanical Properties of Hybrid
2234. [CrossRef]
61. Peng, X.; Fan, M.; Hartley, J.; Al- Bamboo/GFRP and Jute/GFRP Com-
Zubaidy, M. Properties of Natural Fi- posites. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 80. Beckermann, G.W.; Pickering, K.L.
ber Composites Made by Pultrusion 1398–1405. [CrossRef] Engineering and Evaluation of Hemp
Process. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene
72. Sarasini, F.; Tirillò, J.; Puglia, D.; Do-
237–246. [CrossRef] Composites: Fibre Treatment and
minici, F.; Santulli, C.; Boimau, K.;
62. Sèbe, G.; Cetin, N.S.; Hill, C.A.S.; Valente, T.; Torre, L. Biodegradable Matrix Modification. Compos. Part A
Hughes, M. RTM Hemp Fibre-Rein- Polycaprolactone-Based Compos- Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2008, 39, 979–988.
forced Polyester Composites. Appl. ites Reinforced with Ramie and Bo- [CrossRef]
Compos. Mater. 2000, 7, 341–349. rassus Fibres. Compos. Struct. 2017, 81. Ramesh, M.; Deepa, C.; Arpitha, G.R.;
[CrossRef] 167, 20–29. [CrossRef] Gopinath, V. Effect of Hybridization on
Properties of Hemp-Harbon Fibre-
63. Steenkamer, D.A.; Sullivan, J.L. On the 73. Chaudhary, V.; Bajpai, P.K.; Mahesh-
Recyclability of a Cyclic Thermoplas- wari, S. Studies on Mechanical and Reinforced Hybrid Polymer Compos-
ites Using Experimental and Finite
tic Composite Material. Compos. Part Morphological Characterization of
Element Analysis. World J. Eng. 2019,
B Eng. 1998, 29, 745–752. [Cross- Developed Jute/Hemp/Flax Rein-
Ref] forced Hybrid Composites for Struc- 16, 248–259. [CrossRef]
tural Applications. J. Nat. Fibers 2018, 82. Mwaikambo, L.Y.; Ansell, M.P. The Ef-
64. Pickering, S.J. Recycling Technolo- 15, 80–97. [CrossRef] fect of Chemical Treatment on the
gies for Thermoset Composite Mate- Properties of Hemp, Sisal, Jute and
rials-Current Status. Compos. Part A 74. Maslinda, A.B.; Abdul Majid, M.S.; Kapok for Composite Reinforcement.
Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1206– Ridzuan, M.J.M.; Afendi, M.; Gibson, Die Angew. Makromol. Chem. 2000,
1215. [CrossRef] A.G. Effect of Water Absorption on the
Mechanical Properties of Hybrid In- 272, 108–116. [CrossRef]
65. Peijs, T. Natural Fiber Based Com- terwoven Cellulosic-Cellulosic Fibre 83. Sawpan, M.A.; Pickering, K.L.; Ferny-
posites. Mater. Technol. 2000, 15,
Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Com- hough, A. Improvement of Mechani-
281–285. [CrossRef]
pos. Struct. 2017, 167, 227–237. cal Performance of Industrial Hemp
66. Dong, J.; Locquet, A.; Declercq, N.F.; [CrossRef] Fibre Reinforced Polylactide Biocom-
Citrin, D.S. Polarization-Resolved Ter- 75. Huda, M.S.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K.; posites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci.
ahertz Imaging of Intra- and Inter- Misra, M. Effect of Chemical Modifi- Manuf. 2011, 42, 310–319. [Cross-
Laminar Damages in Hybrid Fiber- cations of the Pineapple Leaf Fiber Ref]
Reinforced Composite Laminate Surfaces on the Interfacial and Me- 84. Ragoubi, M.; Bienaimé, D.; Molina, S.;
Subject to Low-Velocity Impact. Com- chanical Properties of Laminated George, B.; Merlin, A. Impact of Coro-
pos. Part B Eng. 2016, 92, 167–174. Biocomposites. Compos. Interfaces na Treated Hemp Fibres onto Me-
[CrossRef] 2008, 15, 169–191. [CrossRef] chanical Properties of Polypropylene
Composites Made Thereof. Ind. Crops
67. Panthapulakkal, S.; Sain, M. Injection- 76. Mehta, G.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K.;
Molded Short Hemp Fiber/Glass Fi- Misra, M. Effect of Fiber Surface Treat- Prod. 2010, 31, 344–349. [CrossRef]
berReinforced Polypropylene Hybrid ment on the Properties of Biocom- 85. Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Solheim, O.;
Composites—Mechanical, Water Ab- posites from Nonwoven Industrial Lenes, M.; Larsen, Å. A Method for
sorption and Thermal Properties. J. Hemp Fiber Mats and Unsaturated Estimating the Fibre Length in Fibre-
Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103, 2432– Polyester Resin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. PLA Composites. J. Microsc. 2013,
2441. [CrossRef] 2006, 99, 1055–1068. [CrossRef] 250, 15–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
68. Swolfs, Y.; Gorbatikh, L.; Verpoest, I. 77. Sgriccia, N.; Hawley, M.C.; Misra, M. 86. Islam, M.S.; Pickering, K.L.; Foreman,
Fibre Hybridisation in Polymer Com- Characterization of Natural Fiber N.J. Influence of Alkali Fiber Treatment
posites: A Review. Compos. Part A Surfaces and Natural Fiber Compos- and Fiber Processingon the Mechan-
Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2014, 67, 181–200. ites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. ical Properties of Hemp/Epoxy Com-
[CrossRef] 2008, 39, 1632–1637. [CrossRef] posites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119,
3696–3703. [CrossRef]
69. Song, Y.S.; Lee, J.T.; Ji, D.S.; Kim, M.W.; 78. Baghaei, B.; Skrifvars, M.; Salehi, M.;
Lee, S.H.; Youn, J.R. Viscoelastic and Bashir, T.; Rissanen, M.; Nousiainen, 87. Brahim, S.B.; Cheikh, R.B. Influence
Thermal Behavior of Woven Hemp P. Novel Aligned Hemp Fibre Rein- of Fibre Orientation and Volume Frac-
Fiber Reinforced Poly (Lactic Acid) forcement for Structural Biocompos- tion on the Tensile Properties of Uni-

NCM-DECEMBER 2022
46